Sweetheart "Resonance" Blackwood Low D whistle
Maker - Sweetheart Flute Co. (Ralph and Walt Sweet) www.sweetheartflute.com
Material - Blackwood
Dimensions: Length - 23 1/8th"
Distance between 1st and 3rd bottom holes - 2 3/4ths"
Diameter of 2nd hole from bottom - 3/8ths"
Bore - 5/8ths"
Weight - 8 oz
Price at time of review - $525.00 US direct from Maker
I purchased this whistle off ebay from North Art Heritage Music,
in BC Canada. While I always wanted to try a wooden low whistle, I had
avoided Sweetheart low D's in the past as I always thought that they
looked more like recorders than whistles. But when I saw how nice this
Blackwood version looked, I had to give it a go. As you will read
below, my dealings with this whistle also brought me into contact with
Ralph Sweet of the Sweetheart whistle Company, who seems to be a great
guy and went way out of his way to be helpful and answer my
questions.
Appearance: The teardrop, or pear shape of where the head joint attaches to the body of this whistle, along with the window and fipple/mouthpiece construction and
conical body design, all add up to make this whistle look a bit more
like a recorder than a whistle. However, once you look past that
blasphemy, or, ah, issue, this whistle looks and feels nice and
professionally constructed. The Resonance Low D also comes in a
"Laminated wood" version which is considerably less expensive, but I
loved the look of the Blackwood, which appears solid black from a
distance, but reveals rich brown wood grain upon closer inspection. The
only issue I had visually was that a few of the tone holes seemed a
little rough around the edges. The mouth piece is a bit larger
than most other low whistles, and while it wasn't overly uncomfortable,
it did feel a bit awkward and strange at first. The tone holes are
allot smaller than on other low whistles, and the bottom three holes
are allot closer together. The first and fourth holes are also offset, making this one of the only low whistles
that I would say could easily be played with ones fingertips instead of
the pipersgrip. (However, this feature did cause another issue, see
below)
Tone: This whistle definitely
has a very beautiful, rich, pure, warm and woody tone with very little
breathiness. It does border on a very flute like tone, yet it manages
to still sound like a low whistle (and not like a recorder either
thankfully, which tend to sound a bit more nasally) with a very small
amount of chiff. I can certainly understand why they choose to call
this whistle the "Resonance", as the low fundamental D note really,
well, resonates. I was all ready to be completely in love with this
whistle until I stumbled across what I felt was a large issue. The low
E note is incredibly weak and airy sounding, and breaks very easily to
boot. Surrounded by beautiful, rich and resonant notes, it sticks out
like a sore thumb. Now I know that the low E note is almost always the
weakest note on any whistle regardless of maker, but this seemed
a bit more extreme to me than usual, so I shot off an email to the
Sweets to see if maybe there was something wrong with my particular
whistle. I received a very detailed, courteous and helpful response
almost immiediatly from Ralph Sweet. He explained that they wanted to
make a low whistle that could be played with the fingertips, not
the pipersgrip, so they moved the bottom hole up and closer to the
others, which forced them to make it smaller as well. (indeed, this whistle has the smallest bottom hole I have seen on a low whistle)
The trade off for this is a weaker and quieter E note. They felt that
the trade off was worth it, and well, I have to be honest and say that
I don't. I suggested that they consider making a "long reach" version
with a larger bottom hole, and they shocked me by saying that not only
did they think that was a good idea, as there are certainly allot of
low whistle players out there who use the pipersgrip exclusively, but
they also asked if I would be willing to try out a proto type when it
was ready. Of course I said does a bear...? well you know.
Volume: I would describe the
volume of this whistle as being medium/moderate in comparison
to other Low D's I have played. It is well balanced between
octaves, and all the notes, with the exception of the aforementioned E,
can actually be blown softly for a quieter sound, as well as harder for
a louder, resonant sound. One might be
able to get away with playing this in a quiet/smaller session
environment.
Backpressure/air requirement: This
whistle has moderate backpressure, and seems to have a relatively low
air/breath requirement.
Responsiveness: This whistle is
very responsive in the respect that you get a clean tone the instant
you blow, and transitions between notes are very clean and fast.
Ornaments are fine, but not overly crisp or snappy.
Clogging: This whistle clogs if
you look at it sideways. I couldn't get through a whole tune without
having to stop and clear it out at least once. I would definitely use
duponol on this whistle, which isn't surprising considering duponol was
originally made for (gasp) wooden recorders.
Tuning: I can't decide if this
whistle was meant to be tunable or not, I'm thinking it wasn't,
although you may be able to do small adjustments by moving the joint.
Thankfully, you don't really need to, as most of the whistle is
pretty much in tune. Exceptions include the low A note, which was
slightly sharp, and surprisingly the low D fundamental, which was 10
cents flat. C natural is close enough using OXXXOOO fingering.
Sound clip: Amhran na Tra Baine
Summary: It's hard to be fair
when one feels so let down by just one aspect of a whistle. But it's
otherwise such a beautiful sounding and playing instrument that the low
E issue is all the more glaring for it. However, I will certainly admit
that for someone looking to play the low D while avoiding the
pipersgrip, this is the whistle for you. It would actually make a great
beginners low whistle as well if it were not for the price tag. I do
want to reiterate that despite this one issue, this is a very nice low
whistle. Four holes. I
certainly look forward to the chance to try the Sweets new version, and
will certainly post what I think here. If it comes out how I think it
will, as the Sweets are obviously very experienced craftsman, it will
be a definite keeper.
